ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR VALID TEST VCE FREE, VALID ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR EXAM SIMULATOR

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Test Vce Free, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Simulator

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Test Vce Free, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Simulator

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Test Vce Free, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Simulator, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Notes, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Demo, Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Vce

DOWNLOAD the newest PrepAwayPDF ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VgjJaEsXkZxOoXd9sW8lZHl0oZpv9XyO

What do you think of using PrepAwayPDF PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps? PrepAwayPDF PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification training dumps, it may be said, is the most excellent reference materials among all exam-related reference materials. Why? There are four reasons in the following. Firstly, PrepAwayPDF exam dumps are researched by IT experts who used their experience for years and can figure out accurately the scope of the examinations. Secondly, PrepAwayPDF exam dumps conclude all questions that can appear in the real exam. Thirdly, PrepAwayPDF exam dumps ensures the candidate will pass their exam at the first attempt. If the candidate fails the exam, PrepAwayPDF will give him FULL REFUND. Fourthly, PrepAwayPDF exam dumps have two versions: PDF and SOFT version. With the two versions, the candidates can pass their exam with ease.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor) Exam is an internationally recognized certification that attests to the competence of individuals in performing audits of information security management systems (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is issued by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), a global provider of training, examination, and certification services in various fields, including information security.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is a highly respected and sought-after certification in the field of information security management. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is designed to provide individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to plan and conduct effective audits of information security management systems (ISMS) in accordance with the ISO/IEC 27001 standard.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor certification exam is designed for individuals who have a minimum of five years of professional experience in information security management, including two years of experience in auditing. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam covers various topics such as the principles, concepts, and standards of information security management, the audit process, audit techniques, and reporting. It also requires candidates to demonstrate their ability to lead an audit team, plan and conduct an audit, and communicate effectively with stakeholders.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Test Vce Free <<

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Simulator - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Notes

Which one is your favorite way to prepare for the exam, PDF, online questions or using simulation of exam software? Fortunately, the three methods will be included in our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam software provided by PrepAwayPDF, so you can download the free demo of the three version. Choosing the right method to have your exam preparation is an important step to obtain ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Certification. Certainly, we ensure that each version of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam materials will be helpful and comprehensive.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q303-Q308):

NEW QUESTION # 303
In the event of an Information security incident, system users' roles and responsibilities are to be observed, except:

  • A. Make the information security incident details known to all employees
  • B. Report suspected or known incidents upon discovery through the Servicedesk
  • C. Cooperate with investigative personnel during investigation if needed
  • D. Preserve evidence if necessary

Answer: A

Explanation:
The role and responsibility that system users should not observe in the event of an information security incident is D: make the information security incident details known to all employees. This is not a proper role or responsibility for system users, as it could cause unnecessary panic, confusion or speculation among employees who are not involved in the incident response process. It could also compromise the confidentiality and integrity of the incident information, which could be sensitive or confidential in nature. Making the information security incident details known to all employees could also violate the information security policies and procedures of the organization, which may require a certain level of discretion and confidentiality when dealing with incidents. The other roles and responsibilities are correct, as they describe what system users should do in the event of an information security incident, such as reporting the incident to the Servicedesk (A), preserving evidence if necessary (B), and cooperating with investigative personnel if needed. These roles and responsibilities help to ensure a quick, effective and orderly response to information security incidents. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to implement procedures for reporting and managing information security incidents (see clause A.16.1). References: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC
27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Information Security Incident Management?


NEW QUESTION # 304
Which two options are benefits of third-party accredited certification of information security management systems to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 for organisations and interested parties?

  • A. Third-party accredited certification makes sure the organisation will obtain more customers
  • B. Third-party accredited certification demonstrates that the organisation's ICT products are secured and certified
  • C. Third-party accredited certification demonstrates that the organisation's management system is maintained and effective
  • D. Third-party accredited certification demonstrates the organisation's management system adopted a systematic approach to information security
  • E. Third-party accredited certification demonstrates that the organisation complies with the legal and legislation requirements expected by interested parties
  • F. Third-party accredited certification makes sure the organisation's IT system will be protected from external interference

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
Third-party accredited certification of information security management systems to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 provides assurance to organisations and interested parties that the organisation's management system is maintained and effective, meaning that it conforms to the requirements of the standard, meets the organisation's objectives and policies, and addresses the risks and opportunities related to information security. Third-party accredited certification also demonstrates that the organisation's management system adopted a systematic approach to information security, meaning that it follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, applies the risk-based thinking principle, and considers the context and needs of the organisation and its stakeholders


NEW QUESTION # 305
Scenario 9: Techmanic is a Belgian company founded in 1995 and currently operating in Brussels. It provides IT consultancy, software design, and hardware/software services, including deployment and maintenance. The company serves sectors like public services, finance, telecom, energy, healthcare, and education. As a customer-centered company, it prioritizes strong client relationships and leading security practices.
Techmanic has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified for a year and regards this certification with pride. During the certification audit, the auditor found some inconsistencies in its ISMS implementation. Since the observed situations did not affect the capability of its ISMS to achieve the intended results, Techmanic was certified after auditors followed up on the root cause analysis and corrective actions remotely During that year, the company added hosting to its list of services and requested to expand its certification scope to include that area The auditor in charge approved the request and notified Techmanic that the extension audit would be conducted during the surveillance audit Techmanic underwent a surveillance audit to verify its iSMS's continued effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. The surveillance audit aimed to ensure that Techmanic's security practices, including the recent addition of hosting services, aligned seamlessly with the rigorous requirements of the certification The auditor strategically utilized the findings from previous surveillance audit reports in the recertification activity with the purpose of replacing the need for additional recertification audits, specifically in the IT consultancy sector. Recognizing the value of continual improvement and learning from past assessments. Techmanic implemented a practice of reviewing previous surveillance audit reports. This proactive approach not only facilitated identifying and resolving potential nonconformities but also aimed to streamline the recertification process in the IT consultancy sector.
During the surveillance audit, several nonconformities were found. The ISMS continued to fulfill the ISO/IEC 27001*s requirements, but Techmanic failed to resolve the nonconformities related to the hosting services, as reported by its internal auditor. In addition, the internal audit report had several inconsistencies, which questioned the independence of the internal auditor during the audit of hosting services. Based on this, the extension certification was not granted. As a result. Techmanic requested a transfer to another certification body. In the meantime, the company released a statement to its clients stating that the ISO/IEC 27001 certification covers the IT services, as well as the hosting services.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What action should be taken regarding Techmanic's certification?

  • A. Transfer the certification because they were not granted the extension certification
  • B. Withdraw the certification because they failed to resolve nonconformities related to hosting services
  • C. Suspend the certification because they used the certification out of its scope

Answer: C

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct answer:
Techmanic misrepresented its certification scope, which is a violation of ISO certification rules.
Suspension allows time for corrective action before withdrawal is considered.
B . Incorrect:
Certification withdrawal is only necessary if corrective actions fail after suspension.
C . Incorrect:
Transfer does not resolve misrepresentation issues.
Relevant Standard Reference:


NEW QUESTION # 306
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance. The company was founded in North Carolina, but have recently expanded in other locations, including Europe and Africa.
Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to their industry and preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 and have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Two auditors were assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment. they started the audit activities. First, they reviewed the documentation required by the standard, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information security policies, and internal audits reports. The review process was not easy because, although Sinvestment stated that they had a documentation procedure in place, not all documents had the same format.
Then, the audit team conducted several interviews with Sinvestment's top management to understand their role in the ISMS implementation. All activities of the stage 1 audit were performed remotely, except the review of documented information, which took place on-site, as requested by Sinvestment.
During this stage, the auditors found out that there was no documentation related to information security training and awareness program. When asked, Sinvestment's representatives stated that the company has provided information security training sessions to all employees. Stage 1 audit gave the audit team a general understanding of Sinvestment's operations and ISMS.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the marketing department (which was not included in the audit scope) had no procedures in place to control employees' access rights. Since controlling employees' access rights is one of the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and was included in the information security policy of the company, the issue was included in the audit report. In addition, during stage 2 audit, the audit team observed that Sinvestment did not record logs of user activities. The procedures of the company stated that "Logs recording user activities should be retained and regularly reviewed," yet the company did not present any evidence of the implementation of such procedure.
During all audit activities, the auditors used observation, interviews, documented information review, analysis, and technical verification to collect information and evidence. All the audit findings during stages 1 and 2 were analyzed and the audit team decided to issue a positive recommendation for certification.
Based on scenario 6, during stage 1 audit, the auditor found out that some documents regarding the ISMS had different format. What should the auditor do in this case?

  • A. Verify if the documented information has the appropriate format and is in accordance with the company's documentation procedure since this is a requirement of the standard
  • B. Document this observation as an issue that should be verified during stage 2 audit
  • C. Verify only if the information required by the standard is documented without taking into account the format since this is not a requirement of the standard

Answer: C

Explanation:
The auditor should verify if the information required by the standard is documented, without necessarily focusing on the format, as long as the content meets the requirements of the standard. ISO/IEC 27001 does not mandate a specific format for documentation, only that necessary information is appropriately documented, maintained, and controlled.


NEW QUESTION # 307
You are a certification body auditor, conducting a surveillance audit to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 of a data centre operated by a client who provides hosting services for ICT facilities.
You and your guide are currently in one of the private suites that the client rents out to customers. Access to each suite is controlled using a combination lock. CCTV is also installed in every suite.
Within each suite are three data cabinets in which the client can locate mission-critical servers and other items of networking equipment such as switches and routers.
You notice that whilst two of the cabinets in your suite are locked, the third is unlocked. You ask the guide why. They reply "This is because the client is currently swapping out a hard drive unit. Their technician is currently on a lunch break".
What three actions should you undertake next?

  • A. Review the CCTV records to ensure that only the client has accessed the cabinet since it was last confirmed as locked.
  • B. Do nothing, the room appears adequately protected so it is unlikely that a security incident has taken place.
  • C. When the technician returns from lunch, reprimand them for leaving the cabinet open.
  • D. Raise a nonconformity against control 7.4 'physical security monitoring' as the private suite is not being continuously monitored for unauthorised physical access.
  • E. With the permission of the guide, speak to the customer to confirm that they are in the process of swapping out a drive.
  • F. Raise a nonconformity against control 7.2 'physical entry' as the area where the client's equipment is located is not protected.
  • G. Raise an opportunity for improvement suggesting cabinet doors are locked whenever clients leave their suites, even if they intend to return within a short time.
  • H. Raise a nonconformity against control 5.16 'identity management' as it may not be possible to identify who left the cabinet unlocked.

Answer: A,E,G

Explanation:
Leaving the cabinet unlocked while the technician is on a lunch break exposes the client's equipment and data to potential physical security risks, such as theft, damage, or tampering. This is a violation of the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements for physical entry (control 7.2) and physical security monitoring (control 7.4), which aim to prevent unauthorized access to information processing facilities and assets. Therefore, the appropriate actions for the auditor are:
Raise an opportunity for improvement (OFI) suggesting that the cabinet doors are locked whenever clients leave their suites, even if they intend to return within a short time. This would enhance the security of the client's equipment and data, and reduce the likelihood of security incidents.
Review the CCTV records to ensure that only the client has accessed the cabinet since it was last confirmed as locked. This would verify the integrity and availability of the client's equipment and data, and identify any possible unauthorized access or interference.
With the permission of the guide, speak to the customer to confirm that they are in the process of swapping out a drive. This would validate the reason for leaving the cabinet unlocked, and assess the impact and risk of the activity on the client's information security.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.2, Physical entry
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.4, Physical security monitoring
PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 19, Audit Process
PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 21, Audit Findings


NEW QUESTION # 308
......

You must be curious about your exercises after submitting to the system of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials. Now, we have designed an automatic analysis programs to facilitate your study. You will soon get your learning report without delay. Not only can you review what you have done yesterday on the online engine of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials, but also can find your wrong answers and mark them clearly. So your error can be corrected quickly. Then you are able to learn new knowledge of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials. Day by day, your ability will be elevated greatly. Intelligent learning helper can relieve your heavy burden. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials deserve your purchasing. If you are always waiting and do not action, you will never grow up.

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Simulator: https://www.prepawaypdf.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html

2025 Latest PrepAwayPDF ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF Dumps and ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VgjJaEsXkZxOoXd9sW8lZHl0oZpv9XyO

Report this page